As events in Ukraine
once again enter a critical phase, it seems evident that the current upheaval,
now in its third month, was triggered by the Kremlin in the hope of starting a civil war in the country. This conflict
it intended to use as a bogeyman in order to suppress dissent in Russia itself.
However, the plan appears to have backfired:
instead of a civil conflict, what has emerged in Ukraine is akin to a social
and political revolution involving all layers of Ukrainian society in
resistance to a tyrant-President and a government that has lost all touch with
the electorate.
At present it’s still
unclear what direction the new Maidan movement will take. As the Yanukovych regime
applies brutal force under the Kafkaesque pretext of “anti-terrorist operations”
– thus branding Ukraine’s own people “terrorists” – the peaceful opposition
still has to overcome and reconcile its own internal divisions. It’s uncertain
whether by the end of the present crisis the leaders of the resistance will be
the same as the eloquent but somewhat disconnected figures who have so far
emerged, or whether other hands and voices will eventually take command. What
is clear, though, is that this is a people’s movement: a movement that reflects
a widespread discontent and anger among all age-groups and social classes with the corruption and self-seeking of the political
establishment that has gripped Ukraine in a stranglehold. As a protester says
of Yanukovych: “We cannot trust him. There can be no compromise with a
dictator. He must go.”
No comments:
Post a Comment