Eurasianism

For those who doubt that Russia may be on the brink of some very strange transformations indeed, a look at the website of the International Eurasian Movement may be instructive. According to the website (information is from 2004), the members of the Higher Council of this organization include:

Troshev A.P. – vice speaker of the Russian Senate;

Aslahanov A.A-M. – the adviser of the President of the Russian Federation;

Margelov M.V. – the president of the Committee for International Affairs of the Russian Senate;

Kalyuzhny V.I. – vice-minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia;

Tadjuddin T.S. – grand mufti of the Russian Federation;

Mitropolit .Andrian (Chetvergov) – the chief of Russian Orthodox Old Believers Church;

Sagalaev E.M. – the President of the National Association of Media;

Zagarishvili S.A. – Academician of the Russian Academy of Science;

Djumagulov A.D. – ex-prime-minister of the Kyrghystan Republic;

Chernychev A.S. – Plenipotentiary Ambassador of the Russian Federation;

Efimov N.N. –director of “Red Star” magazine, the official organ of Russian general Staff

"and," says the site, "many other highly distinguished personalities from different countries."

The aims and policies of the Movement are many and varied. To take just one example, here is a short extract from the section containing information on, among other things, military pacts:

The axial significance of the Russian Armed forces (and especially of their strategic sector) must entail the creation of a serial of military pacts, which are required to provide steadiness to the eurasist block along its strategically relevant borders. Major of these pacts is the Russian-Iranian military alliance, which for the first time in history could open to Russia an exit to the «warm seas», and allow the disposition of Russian strategic weapons on the southern shores of Eurasia. As Iran is strategically oriented against West domination and is guided world policy by eurasist priorities, objective reasons for such military do exist. In a medium term outlook just the Moscow-Teheran military axis is able to organise a strategic power space countering the West in the Near East, in the Caucasus and in Central Asia.

Among the Arab countries, military pacts must be concluded with Iraq, Syria and Libya, that will allow Eurasia to receive a major lever of control on the Mediterranean space.

In Eastern Europe a military pact with orthodox Serbia is relevant, and also it is desirable to neutralise (even better, to attract on our side) orthodox countries (Bulgaria, Romania, Greece, Macedonia etc.), contributing to their distancing from NATO.

Other major pact is the military alliance of Moscow with India and China. (Though it is hardly possible to hope for strong geopolitical ties with China, since between Moscow and Peking there are too many strategic contradictions, and in a critical situation China will probably act as a coast base of atlantism).

In a parallel way to the conclusion of military pacts within the framework of Eurasia, it is necessary to actively cooperate to splitting the unity of NATO countries, and to contribute to the strategic neutralisation of the Central-European region (more widely, of all Europe) and the Pacific region.

Very important to the conclusion of these strategic pacts will be to demonstrate, that the issue is not about the religious, ideological, political likeness of the participants of the Eurasist Block, but about unity of common purpose — the opposition to atlantist hegemony, to the autocratic establishing of US «new world order» and to the oligarchic «world government». Hence, any given military alliance pursues a defensive and, most important, liberation purpose, ensuring geopolitical conditions of sovereignty to all states and peoples before the planetary offensive of the mondialist pattern, which means depriving them of this sovereignty.